Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 19, 2020

Gipson v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:19-cv-00462
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Gipson v. Amazon.Com, Inc., Judge Ronnie Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration within 45 days.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon.Com Services, Inc.; the case was closed after the court was informed of a settlement in principle.

What happened

Gipson v. Amazon.Com, Inc. involved Mary Gipson, Dwayne Ashley, Vincent Ashley, and Ramonika Ashley, as executor of Howard Ashley’s estate, against Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon.Com Services, Inc. The court was told that the case had settled in principle.

The court ordered the action discontinued without costs to any party. It allowed the case to be restored to the court’s docket if an application was made within 45 days of the order; later applications could be denied solely because they were late.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also directed that any request for the court to retain authority to enforce a settlement had to place the settlement terms on the public record and receive the court’s approval within 30 days. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gipson v. Amazon.Com, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-00462
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Feb. 19, 2020

Background

The plaintiffs were Mary Gipson, Dwayne Ashley, Vincent Ashley, and Ramonika Ashley, as executor of the Estate of Howard Ashley. The defendants were Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon.Com Services, Inc. The court stated that it had been informed that the case had settled in principle.

Order

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 45 days. It stated that any application to reopen filed after that period might be denied solely because it was late.

The court further stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain authority to enforce a settlement agreement, the settlement terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The clerk was directed to close the case.

Disposition

This was a procedural order closing the case after the court was informed of a settlement in principle. The order did not decide the underlying claims or state the settlement’s terms. Judge Ronnie Abrams signed the order on February 19, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.