Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 20, 2020

Monroy-Gill v. Fresco News Incorporated

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:17-cv-06743
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
EmploymentFlsaClass ActionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Monroy-Gill v. Fresco News Incorporated, Judge Netburn preliminarily approved a wage settlement, certified a settlement class, and scheduled a final fairness hearing.

Who this affects

The proposed settlement class consisted of individuals who worked at Fresco between May 1, 2017, and July 1, 2017, excluding the defendants and company executives; the order also affected the named plaintiffs, defendants, and AndersonDodson, P.C.

What happened

In Monroy-Gill v. Fresco News Incorporated, the plaintiffs asked the court to preliminarily approve a proposed settlement of wage claims involving Fresco and several individual defendants. The proposed class covered individuals who worked at Fresco from May 1, 2017, through July 1, 2017, excluding the defendants and company executives.

The court granted preliminary approval of the settlement, finding it within the possible range for approval, reached through extensive arm’s-length negotiations, and fair and reasonable under standards governing Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. The court also provisionally certified the settlement class, appointed AndersonDodson, P.C. as class counsel, approved the notice and claim form, and approved the settlement procedure. It scheduled a final fairness hearing for April 27, 2020.

Judge Sarah Netburn entered the order on February 20, 2020. The order granted preliminary approval, not final approval, and directed the parties to follow the settlement agreement’s other terms.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Monroy-Gill v. Fresco News Incorporated · No. 1:17-cv-06743
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Feb. 20, 2020

Background

The plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement, provisional certification of a settlement class, appointment of AndersonDodson, P.C. as class counsel, approval of the proposed settlement notice and class-action procedure, and approval of the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement under the standards described in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

The proposed settlement class consisted of all individuals who worked at Fresco at any time from May 1, 2017, through July 1, 2017, except the defendants and company executives. The opinion identifies a common issue as whether the defendants paid Fresco employees all wages owed to them.

Rulings

The court granted preliminary approval of the settlement agreement. It found that the agreement was within the possible range for settlement approval, resulted from extensive arm’s-length negotiations by experienced counsel, and was fair and reasonable under the standards applicable to Fair Labor Standards Act claims.

The court provisionally certified the proposed Rule 23 settlement class. It found that the requirements for class certification were met, including that the class was large enough to make individual lawsuits impractical, shared factual and legal issues, had claims arising from the same circumstances, and had no conflicting interests. The court also found that common issues predominated and that resolving the matter as a class action was more efficient than individual lawsuits.

The court appointed AndersonDodson, P.C. as class counsel under Rule 23(g), based on the firm’s work in identifying, investigating, litigating, and settling the claims and its experience with employment, wage-and-hour, and class-action matters.

The court approved the proposed notice and claim form and directed that they be distributed to the class. It found that the notice complied with due-process requirements and Rule 23, described the settlement generally, explained the proposed attorneys’ fees, and provided information about the final approval hearing.

The court approved the settlement procedure and scheduled a final fairness hearing for Monday, April 27, 2020, at 2:00 p.m., at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, Courtroom 219. The parties were directed to follow the other terms of the settlement agreement.

Disposition

Judge Sarah Netburn granted the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, provisional certification of the settlement class, appointment of class counsel, approval of the proposed notice and class-action procedure, and approval of the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement. The order did not state that final settlement approval had been entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.