Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 21, 2020

Obotette v. National Football League

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-00876
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Obotette v. National Football League, Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint as frivolous.

Who this affects

Ubong Bassey Obotette’s action against the National Football League was dismissed as frivolous, and he was denied fee-free status for an appeal.

What happened

In Obotette v. National Football League, Ubong Bassey Obotette, who represented himself, sued the National Football League. He claimed that past events gave him ownership and control of the Denver Broncos and the NFL, and he sought to operate the business and recover money.

The court said the allegations were irrational and did not support any legal claim, even when read generously for a self-represented plaintiff. It concluded that amending the complaint would not fix those problems.

Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the action as frivolous under the federal law governing fee-free lawsuits. The court also said an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Obotette v. National Football League · No. 1:20-cv-00876
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Feb. 21, 2020

Background

Ubong Bassey Obotette (Obong) brought the action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying court fees. The court had granted that request on February 18, 2020. He sued the National Football League.

Using the court’s general complaint form, Obotette checked federal-question and diversity jurisdiction. He described the right allegedly violated as “the right to run (control) and own my own business.” He stated that he was a citizen of Maryland and also identified himself as a citizen or subject of Nigeria. He stated that the NFL was incorporated under New York law and had its principal place of business in Colorado.

Obotette alleged that, after he was assaulted by gang members in 1983, Pat Bowlen, who was then the Denver Broncos’ owner, settled the matter by granting him ownership shares in the team. He further alleged that an ownership group led by Saddam Hussein bought the NFL in 1987 and included him in the ownership group, and that Hussein later signed over the NFL to him. Obotette claimed that he became the NFL’s owner, chairman, chief executive officer, and chief operating officer. He also alleged that Brittany and Beth Bowlen signed the Denver Broncos over to him and that he was entitled to complete control of the team. He sought to operate the business and recover funds.

Court’s analysis

Because Obotette was proceeding without paying filing fees, the court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). That law requires dismissal of a fee-free complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a legally valid claim, or seeks money from an immune defendant. The court also noted that it must dismiss a case when it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction and that it must read self-represented pleadings generously.

The court concluded that Obotette’s claims were irrational and had no legal theory supporting them. It determined that the defects could not be corrected by amending the complaint, so it declined to give him permission to amend.

Disposition

The court dismissed the complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). It directed the clerk to mail the order to Obotette and record service on the docket. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.