Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 24, 2020

Davis v. Westchester County

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:20-cv-00517
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Davis v. Westchester County, Judge Roman ordered Marshals service of Michael Davis’s civil-rights complaint and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Michael Davis and the seven named defendants: Westchester County; Wellpath Medical Services; Correct Care Solutions, LLC; Dr. Raul Ulloa; Alexis Gendell; Sergeant D. Lopez, Shield No. 206; and Assistant Warden Spaulding. The Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take steps to serve the defendants.

What happened

In Davis v. Westchester County, Michael Davis, who was being held at the Westchester County Jail and represented himself, sued the County, medical-service companies, and jail employees under a federal civil-rights law. He sought money and a court declaration.

The court had already allowed Davis to proceed without paying court fees in advance. Because of that status, the court ordered the Clerk to issue summonses and prepare service forms, and directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses were issued.

Judge Nelson S. Roman denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order directed service of the complaint; it did not decide whether Davis’s claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Davis v. Westchester County · No. 7:20-cv-00517
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Feb. 24, 2020

Background

Michael Davis, who was being held at the Westchester County Jail, filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing certain civil-rights claims against government actors. He sought damages and declaratory relief. The defendants named in the complaint were Westchester County; Wellpath Medical Services; Correct Care Solutions, LLC; Dr. Raul Ulloa; Alexis Gendell; Sergeant D. Lopez, Shield No. 206; and Assistant Warden Spaulding.

The court had previously granted Davis permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. The opinion notes that prisoners remain responsible for paying the full filing fee over time even when granted that permission.

Service of Process

Because Davis was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 generally requires service within 90 days after filing, but the court explained that Davis could not serve the defendants until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses issued. The court therefore extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses were issued.

The Clerk of Court was instructed to prepare a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue summonses, and give the Marshals Service the documents needed to complete service. The court also directed the Clerk to mail Davis a copy of the order and an information package.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk to issue summonses and arrange Marshals Service for all seven defendants. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Davis permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Judge Nelson S. Roman’s order addressed service and appeal-fee status; it did not decide the merits of Davis’s underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.