Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 3, 2020

Darrell v. State of New York

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-00248
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Darrell v. State of New York, Chief Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Darrell neither filed authorization nor paid filing fees.

Who this affects

Rose Darrell's complaint was dismissed without prejudice because Darrell did not submit the required updated prisoner authorization or pay the $400 filing fee. Any appeal would not receive permission to proceed without paying fees under this order.

What happened

Rose Darrell sued the State of New York in Darrell v. State of New York. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

The court had ordered Darrell to file an updated prisoner authorization or pay the required $400 filing fee within 30 days. The order warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal, and Darrell did neither.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The court also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Darrell v. State of New York · No. 1:20-cv-00248
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 3, 2020

Background

The court had previously ordered Plaintiff Rose Darrell to submit an updated prisoner authorization or pay the $400 filing fee required to bring a civil action. The January 22, 2020 order gave Darrell 30 days to comply and stated that failure to do so would result in dismissal. The opinion does not describe the claims in the complaint.

Ruling

Because Darrell did not file an updated prisoner authorization and did not pay the filing fee, Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Darrell and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.