Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Mar. 5, 2020

Grebinger v. United States

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:19-cv-08600
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCriminal
In one sentence

In Grebinger v. United States, Judge Seibel granted Grebinger’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and vacated his firearm conviction.

Who this affects

Christopher Grebinger’s conviction on Count Two was vacated; he was resentenced on Count One, and the related civil case was closed.

What happened

In Grebinger v. United States, the court considered how the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Davis affected Christopher Grebinger’s firearm conviction.

The conviction was under a federal law covering using, carrying, or possessing a firearm during and in relation to a violent crime. The charged violent crime was a racketeering conspiracy.

Judge Seibel granted Grebinger’s motion under a federal post-conviction statute, vacated the conviction on Count Two, resentenced him on Count One, and directed that the related civil case be closed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Grebinger v. United States · No. 7:19-cv-08600
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Mar. 5, 2020

Background

Christopher Grebinger challenged his conviction on Count Two of the indictment. That count charged him under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) with using, carrying, and possessing firearms during and in relation to a crime of violence—specifically, the racketeering conspiracy charged in Count One.

The court considered the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). The opinion states that the court received and reviewed the parties’ submissions and that the parties agreed vacating the § 924(c) conviction was appropriate.

Ruling

The court granted Grebinger’s motion to vacate the conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a federal procedure for challenging a federal conviction or sentence after judgment. The court vacated his conviction on Count Two, resentenced him on Count One, and entered an amended judgment.

The order resolved the motion filed in the criminal case and the motion filed in the related civil case. Judge Cathy Seibel directed the Clerk of Court to close civil case No. 19-CV-8600. The opinion does not provide further details about the amended sentence.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.