Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 5, 2020

Nesbeth v. New York City Management LLC

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:17-cv-08650
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Nesbeth v. New York City Management LLC, Judge Koeltl ordered the parties to submit materials supporting review of their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendants in this Fair Labor Standards Act case, along with their attorneys, must provide the required settlement-review materials.

What happened

Nesbeth v. New York City Management LLC is a case involving one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties had reached a settlement that required court review.

The court required the parties to file a joint letter-motion by March 26, 2020. They must explain why the settlement is fair and reasonable, including the claims and defenses, possible damages, the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s case, the negotiation process, and other relevant factors. They must also provide information about attorney fees, the fee agreement, actual fees spent, and a copy of the settlement agreement.

Judge John Koeltl ordered the parties to submit these materials; the order did not approve or reject the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nesbeth v. New York City Management LLC · No. 1:17-cv-08650
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
Mar. 5, 2020

Background

The case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing certain wages and working conditions. The opinion states that the parties had reached a settlement. Because of the requirements described in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., the settlement required court review for fairness and reasonableness.

Required submissions

The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter-motion by March 26, 2020. A letter-motion is a written request submitted to the court. The parties must address:

- the claims and defenses; - the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it; - the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiff’s claims and the defendants’ defenses; - any factors explaining a difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount; - the litigation and settlement-negotiation process; and - other matters relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable, including whether a judgment would be collectible if the case went to trial.

The parties must also explain their attorney-fee arrangement, attach the retainer agreement, provide information about the actual attorney fees spent, and attach the settlement agreement itself.

Disposition

The court ordered submission of the settlement materials. It did not state that it approved or rejected the settlement, and it did not decide the underlying Fair Labor Standards Act claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.