Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 5, 2020

Grazette v. Rockefeller

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:20-cv-00965
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Grazette v. Rockefeller, Judge McMahon granted more time to pay filing fees or submit a corrected fee-waiver application.

Who this affects

The order affects David I. Grazette by giving him 30 days to pay the $400 filing fees or submit a corrected application to proceed without prepaying them. If he does not comply, the court stated that it will dismiss the action; no summons has issued yet.

What happened

In Grazette v. Rockefeller, David I. Grazette asked for 30 more days to pay the fees required to bring his case after misunderstanding an earlier court order.

The court explained that it had not denied his application to proceed without prepaying fees. Instead, the earlier order found that his application lacked information about his expenses, dependents, debts, and financial obligations.

The court granted the 30-day extension and ordered Grazette to pay $400 or submit a corrected application addressing those issues. No summons would issue yet, and Judge McMahon stated that the action would be dismissed if Grazette did not comply.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Grazette v. Rockefeller · No. 1:20-cv-00965
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Mar. 5, 2020

Background

The court had previously ordered Plaintiff David I. Grazette to pay the $400 fees required to bring a civil action or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees and costs. Grazette then requested an additional 30 days to pay, stating that his application had been denied and that he needed more time.

Court’s clarification

The court explained that its earlier order had not denied Grazette’s fee-waiver application. Rather, the application did not answer questions about his monthly expenses, dependents, debts, and other financial obligations. Because the application did not provide enough information, the court could not determine whether Grazette was unable to pay the filing fees.

Ruling and effect

The court granted Grazette’s request for a 30-day extension. Within 30 days of the order, he had to either pay the $400 fees or submit an amended application. The amended application had to answer each question on the form and provide facts explaining how he supported himself and why he could not pay the fees. It also had to identify docket number 20-CV-0965 (CM).

The Clerk was directed to send the order to Grazette and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that it would proceed with the case if Grazette complied and would dismiss the action if he did not comply within the allowed time. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.