Timperio v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center
- Paul Gardephe
- 1:18-cv-01804
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 6
In Timperio v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, Judge Gardephe granted a stay, denied the Hospital’s other requests, and denied its case-management motion without prejudice.
The stay pauses Justin Timperio’s claims against Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center and Upstate Guns and Ammo, LLC while the related Workers’ Compensation Board proceedings continue. The parties must provide periodic updates to the court.
What happened
Justin Timperio sued Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center and Upstate Guns and Ammo, LLC, alleging that the Hospital was negligent after Dr. Henry Bello returned to the Hospital with a rifle and shot Timperio and others. Timperio’s claims against the Hospital included negligence, emotional distress caused by negligence, and negligent hiring, retention, training, and supervision.
The Hospital asked the court to reconsider its earlier decision denying summary judgment, or to allow an appeal before final judgment. It also asked the court to pause the case while related workers’ compensation proceedings continued. The court granted the stay, denied the Hospital’s other requests, and denied the Hospital’s request for a case-management plan without prejudice.
Judge Paul G. Gardephe concluded that the workers’ compensation proceedings could affect the outcome of the federal case and might clarify whether Timperio’s claims could proceed. The parties must provide updates every 60 days and notify the court within one week of any decision by the administrative law judge or Workers’ Compensation Board.
The detailed version
- Timperio v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center · No. 1:18-cv-01804
- Paul Gardephe
- Mar. 9, 2020
Background
Justin Timperio brought a negligence action against Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center and Upstate Guns and Ammo, LLC. The complaint alleged that, after the Hospital terminated Dr. Henry Bello’s employment, Bello returned to the Hospital wearing a white doctor’s coat, carrying Hospital identification, and carrying an AR-15 rifle. Bello shot Timperio, killed another doctor, and wounded four other medical staff members and a patient. The claims against the Hospital were negligence; negligent infliction of emotional distress; and negligent hiring, retention, training, and supervision.
The Hospital previously moved to dismiss the claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or alternatively sought summary judgment. The court converted that motion into a motion for summary judgment and denied it. The Hospital then moved for reconsideration. Alternatively, it sought certification of an interlocutory appeal, meaning an appeal before the case was finally resolved, or a stay while related proceedings before the Workers’ Compensation Board continued.
Workers’ Compensation Proceedings
An administrative law judge awarded Timperio workers’ compensation benefits and described his injury as a work-related abdominal gunshot wound. The Hospital argued that this decision completely barred Timperio’s claims in the federal case. Timperio responded that he had received no notice of the hearing and argued that the decision should not prevent his claims from proceeding.
The Workers’ Compensation Board’s appellate panel later reversed the administrative law judge’s decision and sent the matter back for development of the record and a final decision about whether Timperio’s injury occurred during the course of his employment. The Hospital argued that this reversal supported pausing the federal case until the Board issued a final decision.
Court’s Analysis
The court explained that it had authority to pause proceedings to manage its docket efficiently. It considered whether the Workers’ Compensation Board proceedings could affect the federal case. New York decisions cited by the court state that workers’ compensation benefits may be an injured employee’s exclusive remedy against an employer, although the court did not decide whether that rule ultimately barred Timperio’s claims. The court determined that the Board proceedings might affect the federal case and could clarify whether Timperio had a legally viable basis for relief.
Disposition
The court granted the Hospital’s motion for a stay. It otherwise denied the Hospital’s motion, including its request for reconsideration and alternative requests concerning an appeal. The court denied the Hospital’s motion for a case-management plan without prejudice. The parties were ordered to submit joint status letters every 60 days and to notify the court within one week of any decision by an administrative law judge or the Workers’ Compensation Board. Judge Paul G. Gardephe did not resolve the underlying negligence claims in this order.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.