Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Mar. 12, 2020

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. GSR Concrete Tov, LLC

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:19-cv-07453
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
10
ArbitrationContractSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In Trustees v. GSR Concrete, Judge Koeltl confirmed an arbitration award and ordered GSR to pay $5,095.90 plus interest.

Who this affects

The petitioning trustees, funds, corporation, and union obtained confirmation of the arbitration award and additional fees and costs; GSR Concrete Tov, LLC was ordered to pay those amounts and applicable interest.

What happened

The Trustees and affiliated funds and organizations asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against GSR Concrete Tov, LLC. The dispute concerned interest GSR allegedly owed after making late benefit-fund contributions under a collective bargaining agreement.

GSR did not oppose the petition. The arbitrator had ordered GSR to pay $3,813.90, and the petitioners also requested attorney’s fees, costs, and interest.

Judge John G. Koeltl granted the petition, entered judgment for the arbitration award with 7.5% interest through the judgment date, and awarded $1,207 in attorney’s fees and $75 in costs, plus statutory post-judgment interest.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:19-cv-07453
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
Mar. 12, 2020

Background

The petitioners were trustees of several funds, a corporation, and a labor union. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act funds were multiemployer labor-management trust funds. The union represented certain employees of GSR Concrete Tov, LLC, and GSR was a member of the Building Contractors Association.

Through that membership, GSR agreed to be bound by a collective bargaining agreement between the association and the union. The agreement required covered employers to make contributions to the funds and to provide books and payroll records for audits. It also allowed disputes about fund payments to be submitted to arbitration and authorized interest, costs, liquidated damages, and attorney’s fees in specified circumstances.

The dispute involved GSR’s failure to pay interest that had accrued on late contributions for the period from March 20, 2012, through January 29, 2013. The petitioners initiated arbitration before Roger E. Maher. In an award dated June 26, 2019, the arbitrator found that GSR violated the collective bargaining agreement and ordered it to pay $3,813.90: $1,413.90 in late-payment interest, $400 in court costs, $1,500 in attorney’s fees, and $500 for the arbitrator’s fee. The arbitrator also awarded interest at an annual rate of 7.5% from the award’s date.

Court’s analysis

GSR did not respond to the petition, even after the court extended its deadline to January 10, 2020. The court explained that a petition to confirm an arbitration award is generally evaluated like a motion for summary judgment based on the petition and supporting record, rather than through a default judgment. Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine dispute about a material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment under the law.

Review of an arbitration award is very limited. A court generally may not reconsider the arbitrator’s factual or contractual conclusions if the award draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement and has at least a barely colorable justification.

The court found that the record showed GSR was bound by the collective bargaining agreement, had violated it by withholding late-payment interest, and owed $3,813.90 plus 7.5% post-award interest. Because the petition was unopposed and there was no genuine dispute of material fact, the court found that the petition should be granted.

Ruling

The court granted the petition to confirm the June 26, 2019 arbitration award. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment for $3,813.90, plus interest at 7.5% from the arbitration award’s date through the date of judgment.

The court also awarded the petitioners $1,207.00 in attorney’s fees and $75.00 in costs. It directed that post-judgment interest on the entire judgment accrue at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a), and directed the Clerk to close the case. Judge John G. Koeltl signed the order on March 12, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.