Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 13, 2020

Rojas v. State of New York

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-02137
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Rojas v. State of New York, Judge McMahon ordered pro se prisoner Richard Rojas to pay fees or submit authorization before the case proceeds.

Who this affects

Richard Rojas, who must satisfy the court’s fee or prisoner-authorization requirement for the action to proceed.

What happened

In Rojas v. State of New York, Richard Rojas, who is incarcerated and representing himself, filed a civil action against the State of New York and others. He submitted an application to proceed without paying fees upfront but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The court explained that Rojas must either pay $400 in fees or authorize installment deductions of the $350 filing fee from his prison account and provide account statements from the previous six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply if the court grants permission to proceed without prepayment.

Judge Colleen McMahon gave Rojas 30 days from the order to comply. The court directed the Clerk to mail him the order, said no summons would issue yet, and stated that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rojas v. State of New York · No. 1:20-cv-02137
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 13, 2020

Background

Richard Rojas, who was incarcerated on Rikers Island, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He applied to proceed without prepaying the filing fees, a status commonly called permission to proceed without prepayment of fees. He did not, however, submit the required prisoner authorization.

Court’s Requirements

The court explained that a prisoner starting a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit the required documents to request permission to proceed without prepayment. If that request is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and to send the court certified account statements covering the prior six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepayment.

Ruling and Next Steps

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered Rojas, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $400 in fees or to complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 20-CV-2137 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail him a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Rojas complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court separately cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under the prisoner-litigation statute, potentially limiting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees after three strikes, unless the prisoner faced imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.