Nitrous Funding, LLC v. Cardinal Equity, LLC
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:20-cv-02216
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Nitrous Funding v. Cardinal Equity, Judge Engelmayer ordered an amended complaint alleging LLC members’ citizenship to establish diversity jurisdiction.
Nitrous Funding must amend its complaint to provide the LLC-membership citizenship information needed to establish diversity jurisdiction; otherwise, the complaint may be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
What happened
Nitrous Funding, LLC v. Cardinal Equity, LLC concerns whether the complaint adequately showed that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction. The complaint identified each company’s organization and principal place of business but did not identify the citizenship of their members.
The court explained that a limited liability company has the citizenship of each member. It gave Nitrous Funding permission to file an amended complaint by March 27, 2020, listing the required citizenship information.
Judge Engelmayer stated that if Nitrous Funding could not truthfully allege complete diversity, the complaint would be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The order did not decide the underlying dispute.
The detailed version
- Nitrous Funding, LLC v. Cardinal Equity, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-02216
- Paul Engelmayer
- Mar. 13, 2020
Background
Nitrous Funding filed the complaint on March 12, 2020, asserting diversity of citizenship as the sole basis for federal jurisdiction. The court observed that both Nitrous Funding and Cardinal Equity are limited liability companies.
Jurisdictional Allegations
For diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members. The complaint alleged that Nitrous Funding was organized under Florida law and had its principal place of business in Florida, and that Cardinal Equity was organized under New York law and had its principal place of business in New York. But it did not allege the citizenship of the companies’ members.
The court directed Nitrous Funding to allege the citizenship of every natural-person member and, for any corporate member, the corporation’s place of incorporation and principal place of business. Those allegations are necessary for the court to determine whether complete diversity exists.
Order
The court granted Nitrous Funding leave to amend under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), requiring the amended complaint to allege the citizenship of all members of both LLCs by March 27, 2020. Judge Engelmayer stated that if Nitrous Funding could not truthfully allege complete diversity, the complaint would be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The order did not reach the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.