Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 18, 2020

McDaniel v. The People of the City of New York

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:19-cv-11265
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In McDaniel v. The People of the City of New York, Judge McMahon granted McDaniel 60 more days to amend his complaint but denied appeal fee status.

Who this affects

Curtis McDaniel, whose deadline to amend his complaint was extended by 60 days and whose fee-free status for an appeal was denied.

What happened

McDaniel v. The People of the City of New York concerns a lawsuit Curtis McDaniel filed without a lawyer under a federal civil-rights law while detained at Rikers Island. The court had previously given him 60 days to file an amended complaint.

McDaniel said that he received the amendment order late because he was transferred to state custody and incarcerated at Bare Hill Correctional Facility. The court granted his request for another 60 days to file the amended complaint and stated that no further extensions would be granted.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon ordered that the amended complaint be filed within 60 days of the order. She warned that the case would be dismissed for failure to state a claim if McDaniel did not comply and could not show good cause. She also denied fee-free status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McDaniel v. The People of the City of New York · No. 1:19-cv-11265
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Mar. 18, 2020

Background

Curtis McDaniel filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims for violations of constitutional rights by state actors. The opinion states that he filed the action while detained at Rikers Island. On January 28, 2020, the court gave him permission to amend his complaint within 60 days.

On March 17, 2020, the court received McDaniel’s letter requesting an additional 60 days. He said his receipt of the order to amend was delayed because he had been transferred to the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and was then incarcerated at Bare Hill Correctional Facility.

Rulings

The court granted McDaniel’s request for an extension of time. It granted him leave to file the amended complaint described in the January 28 order within 60 days of the March 18 order. The court stated that no further extensions would be granted.

The court warned that if McDaniel failed to comply within the allowed time and could not show good cause for the failure, the action would be dismissed for failure to state a claim. That warning was not a dismissal of the action in this order.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. Chief Judge Colleen McMahon signed the order.

Classification

This is a procedural order. It extended the deadline to amend the complaint and ruled on appeal fee status without deciding the merits of McDaniel’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.