Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 18, 2020

Jackson v. Annucci

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
7:20-cv-02008
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Jackson v. Annucci, Chief Judge McMahon ordered a prisoner to pay fees or submit authorization within 30 days.

Who this affects

Lavogia Jackson, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, must either pay the required fees or submit the prisoner authorization within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

Lavogia Jackson, who is incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility, filed Jackson v. Annucci without a lawyer and submitted an application to proceed without paying fees upfront. The application did not include the required authorization to withdraw payments from Jackson’s prisoner account.

The court ordered Jackson, within 30 days, either to pay the full $400 in filing and administrative fees or to submit the authorization. That authorization would allow deductions from the prisoner account toward the $350 filing fee and require submission of certified account statements for the previous six months.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk to mail the order to Jackson and said no summons would issue yet. The court stated that the action will be dismissed if Jackson does not comply, and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jackson v. Annucci · No. 7:20-cv-02008
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 18, 2020

Background

Lavogia Jackson, who was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility, brought this civil action without a lawyer. Jackson submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning without prepaying the court’s fees, but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Fees and required authorization

The court explained that a prisoner proceeding in the case must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit a signed IFP application and a prisoner authorization. If IFP status is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and send the court certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the previous six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted IFP status.

Order

The court ordered Jackson to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the $400 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 20-CV-2008 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail Jackson a copy of the order and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Jackson complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures, and that, if Jackson failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order also warned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.