Watkins v. Colvin
- Loretta Preska
- 1:16-cv-04055
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Watkins v. Colvin, Judge Preska denied Watkins’s federal petition, denied a certificate of appealability, and closed the case.
Dennis Watkins’s federal petition was denied, his certificate of appealability was denied, and the case was closed; all pending motions were denied as moot.
What happened
In Watkins v. Colvin, Dennis Watkins filed a federal petition under Section 2254. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.
A magistrate judge recommended denying the petition. Because neither party objected, the district court reviewed the recommendation and record only for obvious error and found none.
Judge Loretta A. Preska adopted the recommendation, denied Watkins’s petition, and denied a certificate of appealability because he had not shown that a constitutional right was denied. She also directed the clerk to close the case and deny all pending motions as moot.
The detailed version
- Watkins v. Colvin · No. 1:16-cv-04055
- Loretta Preska
- Mar. 23, 2020
Background
Dennis Watkins filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. A habeas petition is a request for federal court relief from allegedly unlawful custody or detention. The order does not describe the specific claims or facts underlying Watkins’s petition.
Report and Recommendation
On August 30, 2019, Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the court deny the petition. The parties had 14 days to object, but neither party filed objections.
When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district court reviews the record for clear error on its face. Judge Preska reviewed the record and the recommendation and found no clear error. She therefore adopted the recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of the court.
Rulings
The court denied Watkins’s habeas petition. It also denied a certificate of appealability after finding that Watkins had not demonstrated a denial of a constitutional right. The clerk was directed to mail Watkins a copy of the order, mark the action closed, and deny all pending motions as moot.
Classification
This is a procedural order under the stated classification rules because the court denied the petition by adopting a recommendation after clear-error review without discussing the underlying merits. The order’s express dispositions were denial of the petition, denial of a certificate of appealability, and denial of all pending motions as moot.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.