Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 23, 2020

Freeman v. Griffin

Judge
Loretta Preska
Docket
1:16-cv-05419
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Freeman v. Griffen, Judge Preska denied Freeman’s habeas petition, denied a certificate of appealability, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Damon Freeman’s federal habeas petition was denied, and the case was closed. The court also denied a certificate of appealability and denied pending motions as moot.

What happened

In Freeman v. Griffen, Damon Freeman asked the federal court to review his detention through a habeas petition under federal law.

A magistrate judge recommended denying the petition. No party objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting a full merits review.

Senior U.S. District Judge Loretta A. Preska adopted the recommendation, denied the petition, denied a certificate of appealability, and directed the Clerk to close the case and deny pending motions as moot.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Freeman v. Griffin · No. 1:16-cv-05419
Judge
Loretta Preska
Date
Mar. 23, 2020

Background

Damon Freeman filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 30, 2019, Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses issued a Report and Recommendation advising that the petition be denied.

Review of the Recommendation

The parties had fourteen days to object, but no objections were filed. The court therefore reviewed the record and the Report and Recommendation for clear error. The court found no clear error and adopted the recommendation in its entirety as the court’s opinion.

Ruling

Senior U.S. District Judge Loretta A. Preska denied Freeman’s habeas petition. The court also denied a certificate of appealability because Freeman had not shown a denial of a constitutional right. The Clerk was directed to mail Freeman a copy of the order, close the action, and deny all pending motions as moot.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.