G.T. v. New York City Department of Education
- George Daniels
- 1:18-cv-11262
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In G.T. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Daniels awarded $18,731.70 in fees and costs after reviewing objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation.
G.T. and C.T. received the ordered payment of attorneys’ fees and costs; the New York City Department of Education was ordered to pay $18,731.70.
What happened
G.T., acting for himself and his child C.T., previously won reimbursement for C.T.’s tuition and a private evaluation under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. G.T. then asked for payment of legal fees and costs from that administrative proceeding and this federal case.
A magistrate judge recommended granting the fee request in part. The Department of Education objected, arguing that the hourly rates were unreasonable and that G.T. had delayed pursuing fees. G.T. responded to those objections.
In G.T. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Daniels adopted the magistrate judge’s report in full, overruled the objections, and granted G.T.’s fee motion in the recommended amounts. The Department was ordered to pay $18,731.70 in fees and related costs.
The detailed version
- G.T. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:18-cv-11262
- George Daniels
- Mar. 30, 2020
Background
G.T., individually and on behalf of his minor child C.T., brought an administrative proceeding under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act seeking reimbursement for C.T.’s tuition for the 2014–15 school year and for a privately obtained neuropsychological evaluation. After a one-day trial, Impartial Hearing Officer Lana S. Flame ruled that C.T.’s parents were entitled to that reimbursement.
G.T. later filed this federal action seeking attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the administrative proceeding and in the federal action under the Act’s fee-shifting provision, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3). Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses issued a report recommending that the motion for fees and costs be granted in part.
Objections and review
The Department of Education objected principally to the recommended hourly rates for G.T.’s attorney, Irina Roller, and her paralegal, Maria Mandilas. The Department also argued that G.T. should not receive an award because of an unreasonable delay in pursuing fees.
Judge Daniels concluded that the objections largely repeated arguments made before Magistrate Judge Moses. He therefore reviewed the disputed recommendations for clear error and found no error, clear or otherwise. The court adopted Magistrate Judge Moses’s report in full and overruled the Department’s objections.
Disposition
The court granted G.T.’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs in the recommended amounts. It ordered the Department of Education to pay a total of $18,731.70, consisting of $12,612.50 for fees from the administrative proceeding, $5,860 for fees incurred in the federal action, and $259.20 in costs.
This was a fee award concerning an earlier administrative proceeding and the federal fee action; the opinion did not reconsider the administrative ruling awarding reimbursement.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.