Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 31, 2020

Calcano v. Cole Haan LLC

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:19-cv-10440
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Calcano v. Cole Haan, Judge Torres denied as moot Cole Haan’s motion to dismiss after Calcano filed an amended complaint.

Who this affects

Marcos Calcano and Cole Haan LLC; the order ended the pending motion directed at the original complaint but did not decide the amended complaint.

What happened

Calcano v. Cole Haan LLC concerns a motion by Cole Haan LLC to dismiss Marcos Calcano’s original complaint for failure to state a claim.

While that motion was pending, Calcano filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint replaced the original complaint, so the motion directed at the original complaint was no longer effective.

Judge Analisa Torres denied the motion to dismiss as moot and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion from the docket. The order did not decide whether the amended complaint stated a claim.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Calcano v. Cole Haan LLC · No. 1:19-cv-10440
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Mar. 31, 2020

Background

On March 13, 2020, Cole Haan LLC moved to dismiss the original complaint for failure to state a claim. On March 27, 2020, Marcos Calcano filed an amended complaint under Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which permits a party to amend a pleading without first obtaining the court’s permission in specified circumstances.

Court’s Analysis

Because the amended complaint superseded the original complaint, the court held that the motion to dismiss the original complaint had become moot. In this context, “moot” means that the motion no longer presented a live issue for the court to decide because it addressed a pleading that was no longer operative.

Ruling

Judge Analisa Torres denied Cole Haan LLC’s motion to dismiss the original complaint as moot. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 28. The order did not rule on the sufficiency of the amended complaint or otherwise decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.