Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 1, 2020

Swinson v. City of New York

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-02694
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Swinson v. City of New York, Judge McMahon ordered payment or a complete fee-waiver application within 30 days and denied fee-waiver status for appeal.

Who this affects

Randy E. Swinson, who was required to pay the filing fees or submit a complete amended IFP application to continue the action.

What happened

In Swinson v. City of New York, Randy E. Swinson filed this action without a lawyer and submitted a prisoner authorization but only the first page of his fee-waiver application.

The court gave Swinson 30 days to either pay the $400 filing fees or complete, sign, and submit an amended two-page application to proceed without paying the fees upfront. The court also said no summons would issue yet and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the payment or amended application and denied fee-waiver status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Swinson v. City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-02694
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Apr. 1, 2020

Background

Randy E. Swinson brought this civil action without a lawyer while detained in the Manhattan Detention Complex. He submitted a complaint, a prisoner authorization, and an incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning to proceed without prepaying court fees. The application contained only the first page of the required two-page form and was not complete or signed as required.

Payment or Amended Application

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit the required IFP materials. If IFP status is granted, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The court ordered Swinson, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 or complete, sign, and submit the attached two-page amended IFP application, labeled with docket number 20-CV-2694 (CM).

Ruling and Effect

The court directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Swinson and note service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. The case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures if Swinson complied, but the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed period. Chief Judge Colleen McMahon also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order additionally cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim could count as a filing “strike” under the prisoner litigation statute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.