Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 3, 2020

Smith v. The New York and Presbyterian Hospital

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:18-cv-00776
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In Smith v. The New York and Presbyterian Hospital, Judge Engelmayer granted Smith 45 extra days to file a notice of appeal because counsel faced COVID-19 disruption.

Who this affects

Plaintiff Zakeenah Smith, her counsel, and the defendants, because the court extended the time for Smith to file a notice of appeal.

What happened

In Smith v. The New York and Presbyterian Hospital, the court had previously entered judgment after granting the defendants summary judgment on Smith’s employment-discrimination claims. The deadline for Smith to file a notice of appeal expired on March 20, 2020.

Smith asked for more time, explaining that her lawyers’ office had closed and shifted to remote work after employees showed COVID-19 symptoms. She filed the request 11 days after the appeal deadline and argued that the delay was excusable because of the public health emergency.

Judge Paul Engelmayer granted Smith’s motion retroactively and gave her 45 days from the order to file a notice of appeal. The order addressed only the filing deadline, not the merits of any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Smith v. The New York and Presbyterian Hospital · No. 1:18-cv-00776
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Apr. 3, 2020

Background

The opinion concerns Plaintiff Zakeenah Smith’s request for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. The defendants are The New York and Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Foundation, Inc., New York Presbyterian Global, Inc., New York Presbyterian Healthcare System, Inc., Gregory Sica, individually, and Samantha Shankar, individually.

On February 18, 2020, the court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing with prejudice Smith’s claims under Title VII and the New York State Human Rights Law. The Clerk entered judgment on February 19, 2020, closed the case, and advised Smith that she could seek an extension if she filed the request within 60 days and showed excusable neglect or good cause.

Request for an Extension

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(A) allows a district court to extend the deadline for a notice of appeal when the request is timely and the party shows excusable neglect or good cause. Smith’s 30-day deadline expired on March 20, 2020. She filed the motion 11 days later, satisfying the rule’s timing requirement.

Smith argued that her delay was excusable because of the COVID-19 outbreak. The memorandum stated that one employee began showing COVID-19 symptoms in late February, a second employee showed symptoms in early March, and the law firm then closed its offices and shifted to fully remote work while monitoring its staff’s health. Smith argued that these circumstances disrupted counsel’s ability to file on time.

Ruling

The court granted Smith’s motion for an extension, retroactively, because the public health crisis had disrupted her counsel’s law practice. The court ordered that Smith must file any notice of appeal within 45 days. This order decided the time for filing an appeal; it did not decide the merits of any appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.