Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 8, 2020

Medina v. 163 Ashley Deli Grocery

Judge
Barbara Moses
Docket
1:19-cv-11443
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Medina v. 163 Ashley Deli Grocery, Magistrate Judge Moses ordered the parties to resubmit their FLSA settlement materials for review.

Who this affects

The parties to the settlement, including Jose Medina and 163 Ashley Deli Grocery, must refile the settlement agreement and required supporting materials by April 22, 2020; the settlement had not yet been approved.

What happened

In Medina v. 163 Ashley Deli Grocery, the parties reported that they had settled Jose Medina’s claims, including claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The court had ordered them to submit the settlement for approval.

The parties filed their settlement agreement but did not file the required joint explanation or records supporting the requested $15,000 attorney-fee award. The court also directed them to address whether the agreement’s confidentiality provision could be approved.

Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses ordered the parties to refile the agreement and the required supporting documents by April 22, 2020. The order did not approve or reject the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Medina v. 163 Ashley Deli Grocery · No. 1:19-cv-11443
Judge
Barbara Moses
Date
Apr. 8, 2020

Background

The parties reported that they had settled the dispute, including claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). On March 23, 2020, the court ordered them to submit their settlement agreement for judicial approval and to file a joint letter explaining why the settlement was fair and reasonable under the factors identified in Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc. The court also required any contingency-fee agreement and time and expense records needed to support an award of attorney fees and costs.

Deficiencies in the Filing

On April 6, 2020, the parties filed the settlement agreement without the required joint letter or attorney records, even though the plaintiff’s counsel sought $15,000 in attorney fees. The court directed the parties to refile the agreement with the required documents by April 22, 2020.

Confidentiality Provision

The court reminded the parties that confidentiality provisions are rarely appropriate in wage-and-hour settlements because of the policy concerns underlying the FLSA. The court specifically directed the parties to address whether it could approve the confidentiality provision in Section 6 of their agreement. The cited decisions explain that a confidentiality provision generally requires compelling justification and may be severed when permitted by the agreement.

Disposition

Judge Barbara Moses ordered the parties to refile the settlement agreement and supporting materials by April 22, 2020, and to address the confidentiality provision. The order did not approve or reject the settlement agreement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.