El Bey v. Cubesmart Self Storage
- Gregory Woods
- 1:20-cv-00521
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In El Bey v. Cubesmart Self Storage, Judge Woods ordered U.S. Marshals service and extended the service deadline while denying appeal fee-free status.
The pro se plaintiff and the three named Cubesmart defendants are affected. The order directs the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants and requires the plaintiff to keep the court informed of address changes.
What happened
In El Bey v. Cubesmart Self Storage, the pro se plaintiff brought claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and what she called the “Mental Health Acts.” The court understood her complaint to include claims under federal, New York State, and New York City disability-rights laws, seeking damages and an order requiring action.
Because the plaintiff had permission to proceed without paying filing fees in advance, the court directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Cubesmart Self Storage, Cubesmart Store 0558, and Cubesmart Corp. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued and required the plaintiff to notify the court of any address change.
Judge Woods ordered the Clerk to prepare the service paperwork and deliver it to the Marshals Service. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal, certifying that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- El Bey v. Cubesmart Self Storage · No. 1:20-cv-00521
- Gregory Woods
- Apr. 10, 2020
Background
The plaintiff, appearing without a lawyer, brought an action under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the “Mental Health Acts,” seeking damages. The court construed the complaint as asserting at least claims under Title III of the ADA, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. The court stated that the plaintiff sought damages and injunctive relief. The court had previously granted her permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.
Service of process
Because the plaintiff was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court explained that the usual rule requires service within 90 days after filing, but the plaintiff could not serve the defendants until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses issued. The court therefore extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued. The plaintiff remained responsible for requesting an extension if necessary.
The court directed the Clerk of Court to prepare a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each of “Cubesmart Self Storage,” “Cubesmart Store 0558,” and “Cubesmart Corp.” It also directed the Clerk to issue summonses and provide the Marshals Service with the paperwork needed to serve those defendants.
Other requirements and disposition
The plaintiff was required to notify the court in writing if her address changed, and the court stated that it could dismiss the action if she failed to do so. The Clerk was directed to send the plaintiff a copy of the order and an information package. The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Judge Gregory H. Woods did not decide the merits of the plaintiff’s disability-related claims in this order.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.