Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 13, 2020

Gonzalez v. Apache Industries LLC

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:20-cv-02793
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Gonzalez v. Apache Industries, Judge Schofield remanded the case to state court because defendants’ removal papers omitted required documents and LLC citizenship allegations.

Who this affects

Juana Torres Gonzalez, Apache Industries LLC, the other defendants, and the state-court proceeding.

What happened

In Gonzalez v. Apache Industries LLC, the defendants removed a state-court case to federal court but did not include the state-court papers required with a removal notice.

The notice also did not allege the citizenship of Apache Industries LLC’s members when the state case began and when the case was removed. The court explained that these details matter when federal jurisdiction is based on the parties’ citizenship.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ruled that the removal notice was procedurally defective and summarily remanded the matter to state court. The clerk was directed to send the state court a certified copy of the order and close the federal case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gonzalez v. Apache Industries LLC · No. 1:20-cv-02793
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Apr. 13, 2020

Background

Defendants filed a notice of removal on April 3, 2020, seeking to move the case from state court to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Defects in the Removal Notice

The court found two procedural defects. First, the notice did not include any process, pleadings, or orders from the state-court action, although federal law requires a removal notice to include those materials. The court explained that this requirement allows the federal court to examine the underlying allegations and determine whether removal is appropriate.

Second, the notice did not allege the citizenship of the members of Apache Industries LLC at either of the two relevant times: when the state action began and when the defendants sought removal. The court explained that, for diversity jurisdiction, an LLC generally has the citizenship of each of its members, and diversity must exist at both times.

Ruling

The court stated that a district court may remand a case on its own for a procedural defect within 30 days after the notice of removal is filed. Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered that the matter be summarily remanded to state court because the defendants’ notice of removal was procedurally defective. Under the order, the clerk was directed to mail a certified copy of the opinion and order to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Bronx County, and to close the federal case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.