Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 13, 2020

Genao v. 9th precinct

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-02836
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Genao v. 9th Precinct, Chief Judge McMahon dismissed the action without prejudice because Genao lacked required permission to file without fees.

Who this affects

Elvin Genao’s action was dismissed without prejudice because he filed without paying the fee and without obtaining the court’s required permission. The opinion does not state that the underlying claims were decided.

What happened

Elvin Genao sued the 9th Precinct in Genao v. 9th PRECINCT. He filed the case without a lawyer and did not pay the filing fee in advance.

The court had previously barred Genao from filing new cases without paying the fee unless he first obtained the court’s permission. Genao had not requested or received that permission before filing this case.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the case without prejudice because Genao did not follow the earlier filing restriction. The court also said an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Genao v. 9th precinct · No. 1:20-cv-02836
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Apr. 13, 2020

Background

Elvin Genao filed this action against the 9th PRECINCT without a lawyer and without paying the filing fee in advance. The opinion states that, in a prior related proceeding, the court had barred Genao from filing any new action without paying the fee unless he first received the court’s permission.

Ruling

Genao had not requested or received permission to file this action. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 for failure to comply with the earlier filing restriction. The provided opinion does not address the underlying claims against the 9th PRECINCT.

Appeal and effect

The clerk was directed to mail Genao a copy of the order and record service on the docket. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. Judge Colleen McMahon signed the order as Chief United States District Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.