Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 15, 2020

Ford v. The Board of Education of The City School District of the City of NY

Judge
Alison Nathan
Docket
1:19-cv-06327
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Ford v. Board of Education, Judge Nathan ordered Marshals to serve the defendants and denied the plaintiff fee-free status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Brian Ford, the New York City Board of Education, Carmen Farina, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Ford v. The New York City Board of Education, Brian Ford, representing himself, brought claims under disability, rehabilitation, age-discrimination, and other laws. He sought money damages and court orders requiring or declaring certain actions.

The court had already allowed Ford to proceed without paying filing fees. It ordered the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, complete service forms, and send the necessary papers to the U.S. Marshals Service, which would serve the New York City Board of Education and Carmen Farina. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses were issued.

Judge Alison J. Nathan also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order. The order addressed service and filing-fee procedures; it did not decide whether Ford’s claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ford v. The Board of Education of The City School District of the City of NY · No. 1:19-cv-06327
Judge
Alison Nathan
Date
Apr. 15, 2020

Background

Brian Ford, who represented himself, asserted claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and other laws. He sought damages, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief against the New York City Board of Education, also known as the New York City Department of Education, and Carmen Farina in her official capacity. The court treated Ford’s March 8, 2020 filing titled “Amended Brief for Complaint with Demand for Trial by Jury” as his amended complaint.

The court had previously granted Ford permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. In such cases, federal law allows the plaintiff to rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Service Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for the defendants, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, and deliver the required paperwork to the Marshals Service. The court also directed the Clerk to mail Ford a copy of the order and an information package.

The court extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses were issued because Ford could not serve the defendants before the court reviewed the amended complaint and ordered the summonses. The court stated that, if service was not completed within that period, Ford should request an extension of time.

Disposition

The court directed service of the amended complaint through the U.S. Marshals Service. It also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order did not rule on the merits of Ford’s claims.

Effect

The order moved the case forward to service on the New York City Board of Education and Carmen Farina. It did not determine whether Ford would prevail on his claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.