Rodriques v. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- Gregory Woods
- 1:20-cv-02355
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 6
In Rodriques v. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Judge Woods ordered service of Rodriques’s discrimination complaint through the Marshals Service.
Marshagay Rodriques, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service. The order requires the Clerk and Marshals Service to take steps to serve MSK and sets the service deadline for Rodriques.
What happened
Rodriques v. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center concerns Marshagay Rodriques’s claims that her former employer discriminated against her because of national origin under federal, New York State, and New York City laws. The court also understood the complaint to assert claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981.
Rodriques was representing herself and had permission to proceed without paying filing fees upfront. The court directed the Clerk to issue a summons and prepare the paperwork needed for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Judge Woods extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued. The court also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for any appeal from this order and directed the Clerk to mail Rodriques the order and an information package.
The detailed version
- Rodriques v. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · No. 1:20-cv-02355
- Gregory Woods
- Apr. 21, 2020
Background
Marshagay Rodriques, who was representing herself, sued Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK), her former employer. She asserted claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws, alleging discrimination based on national origin. The court stated that it could construe the complaint as also asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Rodriques sought damages and reinstatement.
The court had granted Rodriques permission to proceed without paying filing fees upfront on April 15, 2020. In such a case, federal law allows the plaintiff to rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant.
Service Order
The court directed service of the complaint on MSK. It instructed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve MSK.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) generally requires service within 90 days after a complaint is filed. Because Rodriques could not have served MSK until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued, the court extended the service period to 90 days after the summons for MSK is issued. The court stated that, if service is not completed within that period, Rodriques should request an extension of time.
Other Directions and Disposition
The court encouraged people representing themselves to submit filings by email during the global health crisis and provided information about electronic service. It directed the Clerk to mail Rodriques a copy of the order and an information package.
The court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order otherwise directed the steps necessary to serve MSK; it did not decide whether Rodriques’s discrimination claims were legally or factually valid.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.