Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 20, 2020

Gamble v. Lesser

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-02672
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Gamble v. Lesser, Judge Stanton denied Kevin Gamble’s fee waiver and dismissed the action without prejudice under the three-strikes rule.

Who this affects

Kevin Gamble’s ability to proceed in this case without prepaying the filing fee was affected. The action was dismissed without prejudice, and he may seek reopening within 30 days by paying the $400 filing fee or addressing the three-strikes issue.

What happened

In Gamble v. Lesser, Kevin Gamble, who was detained and represented himself, asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. He sued Police Officer Michael Lesser and others.

The court reviewed whether Gamble had previously filed at least three federal civil actions or appeals that counted as strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. It found three qualifying dismissals and found that his allegations about a December 6, 2019 search and arrest did not show an immediate risk of serious physical injury when he filed this case.

Judge Louis L. Stanton denied Gamble’s application to proceed without paying the filing fee and dismissed the action without prejudice under the three-strikes rule. Gamble may ask to reopen the case within 30 days by paying the $400 filing fee or submitting a declaration addressing the three-strikes issue.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gamble v. Lesser · No. 1:20-cv-02672
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Apr. 20, 2020

Background

Kevin Gamble, who appeared without a lawyer, filed this action while detained at the Eric M. Taylor Center. He sued Police Officer Michael Lesser and others and asked to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, a status commonly called proceeding without paying the filing fee.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act contains a “three-strikes” rule. It generally prevents a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying the filing fee if the prisoner previously brought three or more federal civil actions or appeals that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, unless the prisoner faced an immediate danger of serious physical injury when the new complaint was filed.

Prior Cases and Strikes

The court reviewed Gamble’s earlier federal cases. It did not count cases transferred to another court, dismissed for duplicative filing, voluntarily withdrawn, dismissed for failing to file a required filing-fee application or address change, dismissed for failure to comply with court orders, recharacterized as a petition challenging a state conviction, dismissed because filing fees were not paid after the fee waiver was denied or revoked, or dismissed on summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative grievance procedures.

The court counted three other dismissals as strikes: Gamble v. Kelsh, No. 07-CV-00093, which was dismissed for failure to state a claim; a later action asserting the same claims, which was dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim; and Gamble v. Doe, No. 18-CV-3169, which was dismissed for failure to state a claim.

Imminent-Danger Exception

The court determined that Gamble was barred from proceeding without prepaying the filing fee unless his complaint showed an immediate danger of serious physical injury when he filed it. Gamble alleged that on December 6, 2019, his parole officer searched his home without a warrant, resulting in an allegedly illegal arrest. The court concluded that this allegation did not establish the required immediate danger at the time of filing.

Disposition

The court denied Gamble’s application to proceed without prepaying the filing fee and dismissed the action without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s three-strikes rule. The court directed the clerk to close the case. Gamble may move to reopen it within 30 days by paying the $400 filing fee or submitting a declaration showing either that the three-strikes rule does not apply to him or that he has not filed three or more qualifying federal civil actions or appeals. The order does not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.