Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds…
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds v. Universal Drywall Finishing, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:19-cv-09004
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Trustees of the Drywall Tapers v. Universal Drywall, Judge Vyskocil granted default judgment on liability but required more evidence before deciding the claimed damages.
The plaintiffs—the benefit-fund trustees and District Council No. 9—obtained a ruling establishing liability against Universal Drywall Finishing, Inc., but the amount of damages remained unresolved.
What happened
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and the District Council No. 9, Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 asked the court to enter a default judgment against Universal Drywall Finishing, Inc. The defendant did not appear at the telephone hearing, even though it had received notice.
The court accepted the complaint’s factual allegations for purposes of liability, but it required separate support for the amount of damages. The plaintiffs sought $295,499.41 in unpaid benefit-fund contributions and 5.25% interest, but their papers did not clearly explain how they calculated those figures.
Judge Vyskocil granted the motion for default judgment as to liability. She ordered the plaintiffs to file and serve a further affidavit explaining the requested damages and to submit a proposed order requiring the defendant to explain why final judgment should not be entered on damages.
The detailed version
- Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds… · No. 1:19-cv-09004
- Vyskocil
- Apr. 23, 2020
Background
The plaintiffs—the Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds and the District Council No. 9, Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, affiliated with the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO—moved for a default judgment against Universal Drywall Finishing, Inc. The court held a telephone hearing on April 23, 2020. Universal Drywall did not appear, although the plaintiffs had served it with notice of the motion and of the hearing.
Liability and Damages
The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment as to liability. In a default, the court accepts the factual allegations as true for liability purposes, but it does not automatically accept the claimed amount of damages. The plaintiffs relied on a Trade Agreement and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), including 29 U.S.C. § 1132, to support their request for unpaid contributions and interest.
The court found that the plaintiffs’ submissions did not clearly show how they calculated the claimed principal amount of $295,499.41 or the requested 5.25% interest rate. Because the damages were not sufficiently certain or easily calculated from the papers, the court determined that an inquiry into damages was necessary. The opinion states that this inquiry could be conducted through affidavits.
Orders
The court ordered the plaintiffs to file a further affidavit providing more detail about the basis for the requested principal amount and interest rate and to serve that affidavit on Universal Drywall. The court also ordered the plaintiffs to file and serve a proposed order requiring Universal Drywall to explain why final judgment should not be entered concerning damages. The ruling therefore resolved liability but did not determine the amount of damages.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Trustees of the Building Service 32BJ Health Fund, Massachusetts Service…Aug 2026
- Pipe Tradesv. Mike’s Custom
- Keith Federv. Bancorp
- Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Elite…Jun 2025
- Americav. City and
- Board of Trustees of the Western States Insulators and Allied Individual…Feb 2025