Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Apr. 23, 2020

Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Kevin Fox
Docket
1:19-cv-00077
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jesus Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Fox reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings under a party stipulation.

Who this affects

Jesus Ortiz and the Commissioner of Social Security

What happened

Jesus Ortiz challenged a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security in the Southern District of New York. The opinion gives no further details about the underlying dispute.

The parties entered into an agreement about resolving the case. Based on that agreement, the court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and sent the case back for additional administrative proceedings.

Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox ordered the remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:19-cv-00077
Judge
Kevin Fox
Date
Apr. 23, 2020

Background

Jesus Ortiz brought this action against the Commissioner of Social Security. The opinion does not describe the underlying Social Security dispute or the Commissioner’s decision in detail.

Parties’ Agreement

The parties entered into a stipulation, meaning an agreement concerning how to resolve the case. The court relied on that stipulation.

Ruling

The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A sentence-four remand sends the case back to the agency after the court reverses the decision under that statute. Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox also directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.