Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 27, 2020

Toliver v. The City of New York

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-11834
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Toliver v. City of New York, Chief Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint after Toliver failed to file the required amended complaint.

Who this affects

Michel Toliver's complaint was dismissed, and any state-law claims he may have been asserting were not considered by the federal court. The court also denied fee-free status for an appeal.

What happened

In Toliver v. The City of New York, the court had ordered Michel Toliver to file an amended complaint within 60 days. The order warned that failing to do so would lead to dismissal.

Toliver did not file an amended complaint. The opinion does not describe the claims or explain the alleged defect in the original complaint.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the complaint under the federal law governing screening of complaints filed without the filing fee. The court declined to consider any state-law claims and denied fee-free status for an appeal because it certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Toliver v. The City of New York · No. 1:19-cv-11834
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Apr. 27, 2020

Background

On February 21, 2020, the court ordered Michel Toliver to file an amended complaint within 60 days. The order stated that failure to comply would result in dismissal. Toliver did not file an amended complaint. The complaint had been filed without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The opinion does not provide the complaint's factual allegations or identify the specific problem that led the court to require an amendment.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), a provision requiring dismissal of certain complaints filed without paying the filing fee. The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, meaning authority over related state-law claims, that Toliver might be asserting.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to mail Toliver a copy of the order and record service on the docket. Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.