Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 29, 2020

Fernandez v. New York Health Care, Inc.

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:19-cv-11575
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Fernandez v. New York Health Care, Inc., Judge Wang approved the modified federal and New York wage-law settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Margarita Fernandez and New York Health Care Inc., whose wage-law action was resolved through the approved modified settlement and dismissed with prejudice.

What happened

In Fernandez v. New York Health Care, Inc., the court reconsidered the parties’ renewed request to approve their settlement agreement. The court had previously rejected approval because the agreement’s release was too broad.

The parties modified the agreement to limit the release to claims raised in this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law.

Judge Ona T. Wang approved the modified settlement as fair and reasonable and ordered the action dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fernandez v. New York Health Care, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-11575
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
Apr. 29, 2020

Background

On April 20, 2020, the court denied approval of the parties’ settlement agreement under the required fairness review for wage-law settlements. The court specifically identified a problem with the agreement’s release provision.

Renewed Settlement Request

The parties renewed their request for approval and modified the agreement. The modified release was limited to claims raised in this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law.

Ruling

The court approved the parties’ modified settlement agreement as fair and reasonable. Judge Ona T. Wang ordered that the action be dismissed with prejudice and directed the Clerk to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.