Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled May 1, 2020

Tsachalis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-01535
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Social SecurityCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Tsachalis v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Broderick adopted an unchallenged recommendation and granted judgment on the pleadings for the Commissioner.

Who this affects

Violette Ishoo Tsachalis’s challenge to the denial of Disability Insurance Benefits was resolved in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security; the case was closed.

What happened

Violette Ishoo Tsachalis asked the court to review the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. The Commissioner asked for judgment on the pleadings, which is a decision based on the parties’ written filings.

A magistrate judge recommended granting the Commissioner’s motion. Neither side objected to that recommendation.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick reviewed the recommendation for clear error, found none, adopted it in full, and granted the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The court directed the clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tsachalis v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:19-cv-01535
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
May 1, 2020

Background

Violette Ishoo Tsachalis brought an action under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. The opinion identifies Tsachalis as representing herself.

The Commissioner moved for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), asking the court to affirm the Commissioner’s final decision. Judge Broderick had referred the case to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave, who issued a Report and Recommendation on March 5, 2020, recommending that the Commissioner’s motion be granted.

Review of the Report and Recommendation

Neither party filed objections. The court therefore reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s findings or recommendations. Judge Broderick stated that the report was thorough and well reasoned and found no clear error.

Ruling

Judge Vernon S. Broderick adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and granted the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The opinion does not repeat the report’s detailed reasoning. The clerk was directed to terminate any open motions and close the case, and to mail a copy of the order to Tsachalis.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.