Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 8, 2020

Ardaneh v. U.S. Government

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-03450
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Ardaneh v. U.S. Government, Judge McMahon transferred the removal action to Massachusetts because the state cases were pending there and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Hamid Reza Ardaneh’s attempted removal action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the District of Massachusetts; the Massachusetts court was left to decide whether he could proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Ardaneh v. U.S. Government, Hamid Reza Ardaneh, who was held at Bridgewater State Hospital in Massachusetts, filed a lawsuit without a lawyer seeking to move what appeared to be criminal or civil state-court cases against him to federal court.

The court explained that a request to move a state criminal or civil case to federal court must be filed in the federal district covering the state court where the case is pending. Because the relevant state cases were in Massachusetts, the Southern District of New York was the wrong venue.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the case transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts and closed the case in New York. She also directed that any decision about proceeding without paying filing fees be made by the Massachusetts court, ordered that no summons issue from her court, and denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ardaneh v. U.S. Government · No. 1:20-cv-03450
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
May 8, 2020

Background

Hamid Reza Ardaneh, proceeding without a lawyer, brought this civil action while held at Bridgewater State Hospital in Bridgewater, Massachusetts. He attempted to remove to the Southern District of New York what the court said appeared to be criminal or civil actions pending against him in Massachusetts state courts.

Reason for Transfer

The court relied on federal removal statutes. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1455(a), a defendant seeking to remove a pending state criminal case must file the removal notice in the federal district covering the court where the prosecution is pending. A similar venue requirement applies to removal of a state civil case under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a).

Because Ardaneh’s criminal or civil actions were pending in Massachusetts, the Southern District of New York concluded that it was the wrong venue. Massachusetts has one federal judicial district, the District of Massachusetts. The court therefore transferred the action under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), which permits transfer when a case is filed in the wrong venue.

Ruling and Disposition

The court ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, mail Ardaneh a copy of the order, and record service on the docket. The court stated that the Massachusetts court would decide whether Ardaneh could proceed without paying fees. No summons was to issue from the Southern District of New York, and the order closed the case there.

Judge Colleen McMahon also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The opinion does not decide whether Ardaneh may ultimately remove the state proceedings or whether he may proceed without prepaying fees in the District of Massachusetts.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.