Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 12, 2020

Genao v. City Of New York

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:20-cv-02441
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Genao v. City Of New York: Judge Liman ordered officials to identify five defendants in this civil-rights case.

Who this affects

Gabino Genao and the five correction officials identified as Rodriguez, Morgan, Smith, Sands, and Freeman. The order also directs the New York City Law Department and Clerk of Court to take specified identification and service-related actions.

What happened

In Genao v. City Of New York, Gabino Genao, who is incarcerated at Rikers Island, sued New York City correction officials without a lawyer, claiming they violated his rights.

The complaint identified five defendants—Rodriguez, Morgan, Smith, Sands, and Freeman—but did not provide their full names and service addresses. The court found that the complaint contained enough information for the New York City Law Department to identify them.

Judge Lewis J. Liman ordered the Law Department to provide the information to Genao and the court within 60 days. After receiving that information, the court said it would substitute the defendants’ full names and badge numbers, amend the case caption, and request that the Department of Correction waive service.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Genao v. City Of New York · No. 1:20-cv-02441
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
May 12, 2020

Background

Gabino Genao, who is incarcerated in the North Infirmary Command on Rikers Island, filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that correction officials employed by the New York City Department of Correction violated his rights. The defendants named in the complaint included Wardens Walker and Freeman; mailroom officers Rodriguez and Sands; Correction Officers Knepple and Morgan; Captain Smith; and unidentified John Doe defendants.

The Department of Correction declined to waive service on behalf of Rodriguez, Morgan, Smith, Sands, and Freeman. The opinion states that the complaint described Rodriguez, Morgan, and Smith as being present in the mailroom on December 27, 2018, described Genao handing mail to Sands around January 18–22, 2019, and identified Freeman as the warden of O.B.C.C.

Ruling

The court issued an identification order under Valentin v. Dinkins, a procedure requiring assistance for a self-represented litigant who needs help identifying a defendant. The court ordered the New York City Law Department, as the attorney and agent for the Department of Correction, to determine the identities of Rodriguez, Morgan, Smith, Sands, and Freeman and provide their service addresses to Genao and the court within 60 days.

After receiving the Law Department’s response, the court stated that it would substitute the defendants’ full names and badge numbers under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, direct the Clerk of Court to amend the caption, and issue an order requesting that the Department of Correction waive service. The opinion states that this substitution would not prevent the identified defendants from asserting defenses. The Clerk of Court was also directed to mail the order and complaint to the New York City Law Department.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.