Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 11, 2020

Ferreyra v. Decker

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:20-cv-03170
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePreliminary Injunction
In one sentence

In Ferreyra v. Decker, Judge Torres extended the temporary restraining order through May 25, 2020, while considering preliminary-injunction submissions.

Who this affects

The order continued the temporary restraining order affecting the parties in this case, but the opinion does not specify the underlying restrictions.

What happened

In Ferreyra v. Decker, the parties submitted arguments about whether the temporary restraining order should be converted into a preliminary injunction.

The court found good cause to extend the temporary restraining order for 14 more days so it could consider the record and the parties’ submissions.

Judge Analisa Torres ordered that the temporary restraining order remain in effect until May 25, 2020, at 10:45 a.m.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ferreyra v. Decker · No. 1:20-cv-03170
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
May 11, 2020

Background

The petitioners are Henry Ferreyra, Jefferson Denizard, Angel Perdomo Perdomo, Roland Oshane Villiers, and Remigio Tapia Vilchis. The respondents are Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Chad Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The parties briefed their positions in response to the court’s order to show cause why an existing temporary restraining order should not be converted into a preliminary injunction.

Court’s Analysis

Under Rule 65(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a court may extend a temporary restraining order for good cause. The court found good cause because the additional time would allow it to consider the record and the parties’ submissions. It also relied on the reasons stated in its earlier decision granting the temporary restraining order.

Disposition

Judge Analisa Torres ordered that the temporary restraining order remain in effect until May 25, 2020, at 10:45 a.m. The opinion does not describe the specific restrictions imposed by that temporary restraining order or decide whether it should ultimately be converted into a preliminary injunction.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.