Ferreyra v. Decker
- Analisa Torres
- 1:20-cv-03170
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Ferreyra v. Decker, Judge Torres extended the temporary restraining order through May 25, 2020, while considering preliminary-injunction submissions.
The order continued the temporary restraining order affecting the parties in this case, but the opinion does not specify the underlying restrictions.
What happened
In Ferreyra v. Decker, the parties submitted arguments about whether the temporary restraining order should be converted into a preliminary injunction.
The court found good cause to extend the temporary restraining order for 14 more days so it could consider the record and the parties’ submissions.
Judge Analisa Torres ordered that the temporary restraining order remain in effect until May 25, 2020, at 10:45 a.m.
The detailed version
- Ferreyra v. Decker · No. 1:20-cv-03170
- Analisa Torres
- May 11, 2020
Background
The petitioners are Henry Ferreyra, Jefferson Denizard, Angel Perdomo Perdomo, Roland Oshane Villiers, and Remigio Tapia Vilchis. The respondents are Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Chad Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The parties briefed their positions in response to the court’s order to show cause why an existing temporary restraining order should not be converted into a preliminary injunction.
Court’s Analysis
Under Rule 65(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a court may extend a temporary restraining order for good cause. The court found good cause because the additional time would allow it to consider the record and the parties’ submissions. It also relied on the reasons stated in its earlier decision granting the temporary restraining order.
Disposition
Judge Analisa Torres ordered that the temporary restraining order remain in effect until May 25, 2020, at 10:45 a.m. The opinion does not describe the specific restrictions imposed by that temporary restraining order or decide whether it should ultimately be converted into a preliminary injunction.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.