Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled May 13, 2020

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Vantagetop LLC

Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Docket
1:20-cv-01928
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentContract
In one sentence

Trustees v. Vantagetop LLC: Judge Hellerstein granted summary judgment, confirmed a $587,303.63 arbitration award, and awarded fees, costs, and interest.

Who this affects

The judgment affected Vantagetop LLC by confirming the arbitration award and requiring payment of the award, 7.5% pre-judgment interest, $747 in attorneys’ fees, $70 in costs, and statutory post-judgment interest to the petitioners.

What happened

The Trustees of several New York City carpenters’ funds and related organizations asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Vantagetop LLC. Their agreements required Vantagetop to make employee-benefit contributions and provide records for an audit. An arbitrator awarded the petitioners $587,303.63 plus interest after Vantagetop allegedly failed to provide its records, and Vantagetop did not appear in the case.

The court reviewed the petitioners’ request as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. It found that the arbitration award was made under the parties’ agreements and that Vantagetop had not presented a valid basis to cancel or change the award.

Judge Hellerstein granted summary judgment and directed entry of judgment confirming the $587,303.63 award, with 7.5% interest from November 12, 2019, through the judgment date. He also awarded $747 in attorneys’ fees, $70 in costs, and post-judgment interest at the statutory rate, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:20-cv-01928
Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Date
May 13, 2020

Background

The petitioners filed a petition under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. According to the petition, Vantagetop was bound by a Project Labor Agreement and by the Independent Building Construction Agreement. Those agreements required Vantagetop to make contributions on behalf of employees to certain benefit funds and to provide its books and records for an audit upon request. The agreements also allowed arbitration of disputes concerning employer contributions and provided for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in collection efforts.

The petition alleged that Vantagetop failed to provide its books and records for an audit. On November 12, 2019, an arbitrator awarded the petitioners $587,303.63, plus interest at 7.5% from the award date. Vantagetop was served in this case on March 9, 2020, but did not appear. The petitioners then asked the court to treat their petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. The court found that the detailed, verified petition supplied the evidence needed to decide the merits.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that judicial review of an arbitration award under the Labor Management Relations Act and the Federal Arbitration Act is highly deferential. The relevant questions were whether the arbitrator acted within the scope of the arbitrator’s authority and whether the award was based on the parties’ agreement rather than on the arbitrator’s own rules of fairness. The court found that the award was made under the parties’ agreements. Vantagetop had not presented any basis under Federal Arbitration Act Section 10 to vacate the award or under Section 11 to modify it.

The court also considered attorneys’ fees and costs. It found that the Independent Building Construction Agreement allowed those awards and that fees and costs could be awarded when a party unjustifiably refuses to follow an arbitrator’s decision. The court found reasonable the petitioners’ request for $747 in attorneys’ fees for 4.5 hours of work and $70 in costs.

Disposition

Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein granted the petitioners’ motion for summary judgment. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment in favor of the petitioners confirming the arbitration award of $587,303.63, plus interest at 7.5% from November 12, 2019, through the date of judgment; awarding $747 in attorneys’ fees; awarding $70 in costs; and awarding post-judgment interest at the statutory rate. The Clerk was also directed to mark the case closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.