Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2020

In re: 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties

Judge
Loretta Preska
Docket
1:08-cv-10934
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In re: 650 Fifth Avenue, Judge Preska granted claimants’ request to seal confidential financial materials about the building.

Who this affects

Alavi Foundation and the 650 Fifth Avenue Company, whose specified financial reports and unredacted filing may be submitted under seal.

What happened

In In re: 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties, Alavi Foundation and the 650 Fifth Avenue Company asked to file certain materials under seal, meaning not publicly available in the court record.

The materials included a monitor’s quarterly report, a financial report about 650 Fifth Avenue, and an unredacted opposition to the government’s motion to stay. The claimants said these materials contained nonpublic information about cash reserves, rental income, building operations, and anticipated effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on leasing and vacancies.

Judge Loretta A. Preska found that the materials contained confidential commercial information and granted the request to file them under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In re: 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties · No. 1:08-cv-10934
Judge
Loretta Preska
Date
May 14, 2020

Background

Counsel for Alavi Foundation and the 650 Fifth Avenue Company asked the court for permission to file specified materials under seal. The request concerned filings in the ongoing matter involving 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties.

Materials at Issue

The requested materials were: (1) Exhibit I to the Ruzumna Declaration, identified as the Thirty-Ninth Quarterly Report of Monitor Kathleen A. Roberts under the court’s April 28, 2010 order; (2) Exhibit J, identified as the March 2020 financial report regarding 650 Fifth Avenue; and (3) an unredacted copy of the claimants’ opposition to the government’s motion to stay.

The claimants stated that the materials contained nonpublic financial information about the building’s operation and management, including cash reserves, net rental income, and the anticipated effect of COVID-19 on future leasing and vacancies. They cited decisions recognizing that revenue information and financial records of a wholly owned business are commonly treated as private. They also noted that the court had previously allowed related letters and reports about the building’s finances to be filed under seal.

Ruling

The court stated that the materials at issue contained confidential commercial information. Judge Loretta A. Preska granted counsel’s request to file the relevant materials under seal. The order did not address the merits of the underlying dispute or the government’s motion to stay.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.