LONG v. Amway Corp.
- Katherine Failla
- 1:17-cv-02613
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In LONG v. Amway, Judge Failla dismissed the action without prejudice after the arbitration proceeding ended without resolving Long’s claims.
Keyu Long’s federal court action against Amway Corp. was dismissed without prejudice and closed after the related arbitration was dismissed without prejudice.
What happened
In LONG v. Amway Corp., Keyu Long sued Amway Corp., and the court ordered the dispute to arbitration under the parties’ contract. The federal case was stayed while the arbitration proceeded.
The arbitration was suspended after Long did not pay required arbitration fees. The arbitrator later dismissed the arbitration without prejudice, and Long agreed that no further briefing was needed while asking the court either to continue the stay or dismiss the case without prejudice.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla dismissed the federal action without prejudice because the arbitrator’s dismissal had also been without prejudice. The judge directed the clerk to terminate pending motions, adjourn remaining dates, and close the case.
The detailed version
- LONG v. Amway Corp. · No. 1:17-cv-02613
- Katherine Failla
- May 15, 2020
Background
Keyu Long filed this action against Amway Corp. on April 11, 2017. Amway moved to compel arbitration under a provision in its contract with Long. On January 30, 2018, the court granted that motion and stayed the federal case while arbitration proceeded.
Arbitration Proceedings
Long served an arbitration demand in December 2018, and the American Arbitration Association opened a case file. The parties participated in the arbitration process, but the arbitration was suspended after Amway reported that Long had not satisfied her payment obligations under the American Arbitration Association’s commercial arbitration rules. The parties later confirmed that Long was behind on her arbitration bills.
The court told the parties that it would consider a motion to close the case if Long had not paid the arbitration fees. Amway reported that Long had not paid the fees by April 9, 2020, and that the arbitrator had dismissed the arbitration on April 22, 2020, under American Arbitration Association Commercial Rule 57. Amway initially asked the court to confirm the arbitrator’s ruling and dismiss the federal case with prejudice. Amway later clarified that the arbitrator’s dismissal was without prejudice and asked the court to dismiss the federal case without further briefing or motion practice. Long agreed that no further briefing was necessary and requested either a continued stay or dismissal without prejudice.
Ruling
Judge Katherine Polk Failla concluded that dismissal with prejudice would be inappropriate because the arbitrator’s dismissal was without prejudice. The court also found no reason to continue the stay because the arbitration had been dismissed and Long had not indicated that she would refile her claims in arbitration.
The court therefore dismissed this action without prejudice. It directed the clerk to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close the case. The order did not decide the underlying claims on their merits.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…May 2021
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Apr 2021
- Occilienv. Related Partners
- Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. Pure…Mar 2021
- Bensonv. Voss Events
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Feb 2021