Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 18, 2020

Durrell v. State of New York

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-03761
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Durrell v. State of New York, Judge McMahon ordered a prisoner to correct his payment authorization or pay filing fees before the case proceeds.

Who this affects

Robert Durrell, the incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, had to correct his prisoner authorization or pay the required fees for the action to proceed.

What happened

In Durrell v. State of New York, Robert Durrell, who is incarcerated and representing himself, submitted an application to proceed without paying fees upfront and a payment authorization form.

The court found that the authorization allowed collection of only $150, rather than the required $350 filing fee. It gave Durrell 30 days either to pay the total $400 in fees or submit a completed authorization allowing collection of the $350 filing fee from his prison account. The court did not issue a summons and said the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon also denied permission to appeal this order without paying fees, finding that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Durrell v. State of New York · No. 1:20-cv-03761
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
May 18, 2020

Background

Robert Durrell, who was incarcerated at Downstate Correctional Facility, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees and a prisoner authorization. The authorization allowed the court to collect only $150 from his prison trust fund account.

Court’s analysis

Under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915, a prisoner must either pay the required fees or submit an application to proceed without prepayment, along with an authorization permitting installment payments from the prisoner’s trust account. If permission to proceed without prepayment is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires collection of the $350 filing fee in installments. The separate $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted that status.

Because Durrell’s authorization did not cover the full $350 filing fee, the court directed him to submit an updated authorization.

Order

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon ordered Durrell, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $400 in fees or submit the attached completed prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 20-CV-3761 (CM). No summons was to issue at that time. If Durrell complied, the action would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.