Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 19, 2020

Terry v. Stamford

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:20-cv-03847
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Terry v. Stamford, Judge McMahon ordered the prisoner plaintiff to pay fees or submit a corrected authorization before the case proceeds.

Who this affects

Duwayne L. Terry was required to pay the fees or submit a corrected prisoner authorization within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Terry v. Stamford, Duwayne L. Terry, who is incarcerated and represents himself, asked to bring a civil case without prepaying court fees. He submitted the required application and authorization, but the authorization did not clearly allow collection of the filing fee from his prison account.

The court gave Terry 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit a completed prisoner authorization directing deductions of the $350 filing fee from his account. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order, said no summons would issue yet, and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Colleen McMahon denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Terry v. Stamford · No. 1:20-cv-03847
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
May 19, 2020

Background

Duwayne L. Terry, who is incarcerated at Washington Correctional Facility and is proceeding without a lawyer, filed this civil action. A prisoner who wants to proceed without prepaying court fees must submit a signed application and a prisoner authorization. The authorization permits the court to collect the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner’s account and requires the facility to provide certified account statements for the preceding six months.

Terry submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The court found that the authorization did not state that the court could collect the $350 filing fee from his prison account.

Order

The court ordered Terry, within 30 days of May 19, 2020, to do one of two things: pay the total $400 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee, or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization. If he submitted the authorization, it had to identify docket number 20-CV-3847 (CM).

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Terry a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. The order stated that, if Terry complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and Additional Warning

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The court also cautioned that a prisoner’s dismissal for being frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim can count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that three strikes generally prevent a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying fees unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

Disposition

This was a procedural order about the filing-fee and prisoner-authorization requirements. Judge Colleen McMahon did not decide the merits of Terry’s underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.