Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 27, 2020

Torres v. Licon-Vitale

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-03787
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Torres v. Licon-Vitale, Judge Stanton ordered Torres to pay fees or submit forms within 30 days.

Who this affects

The order directly affects Jonathan Torres and determines the fee or filing-form requirements for continuing his case. It also affects the processing of the action and any appeal without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Torres v. Licon-Vitale, Jonathan Torres filed a civil-rights case without paying the filing fees or submitting the required forms to request permission to proceed without paying upfront. The order states that Torres was detained at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and was representing himself.

The court gave Torres 30 days to pay $400 in fees or submit a completed application and authorization allowing installment payments from his prison account. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order, and no summons was to issue at that time.

Judge Stanton warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the action. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Torres v. Licon-Vitale · No. 1:20-cv-03787
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
May 27, 2020

Background

Jonathan Torres filed this civil action while detained at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and proceeding without a lawyer. He submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or the required prisoner authorization.

Fee Requirements

The order explains that a prisoner must either pay $400—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. If that permission is granted, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner's trust-fund account. The prisoner authorization also directs the facility to deduct those payments and provide certified account statements for the preceding six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Ruling

Judge Stanton ordered Torres, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $400 in fees or submit the completed application and prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 20-CV-3787 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Torres and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The order states that the case would be processed under the Clerk's procedures if Torres complied and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order cautioned that a future dismissal for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim could count as a statutory strike under the prisoner-litigation law.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.