Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 27, 2020

535-545 Fee LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLC

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:20-cv-04043
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In 535-545 Fee LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLC, Judge Furman ordered citizenship allegations amended or warned of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

Who this affects

535-545 Fee LLC must amend its complaint to provide the required citizenship information about the members of both LLCs. NBA Media Ventures, LLC is affected because the complaint must establish the citizenship of its members; the court warned that the case would be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction if complete diversity could not be truthfully alleged.

What happened

535-545 Fee LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLC is a case in which the plaintiff relied on the parties’ citizenship to invoke federal jurisdiction.

The court explained that a limited liability company’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of each of its members. The complaint identified the parties’ business addresses and states of incorporation but did not identify the members of either company.

The court ordered the plaintiff to amend the complaint by June 5, 2020, to provide the required citizenship information. Judge Jesse M. Furman warned that the complaint would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction if the plaintiff could not truthfully allege complete diversity.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
535-545 Fee LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-04043
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
May 27, 2020

Background

535-545 Fee LLC sued NBA Media Ventures, LLC and invoked federal subject-matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was a citizen of New York and that the defendant was a citizen of New Jersey and Delaware.

Jurisdictional pleading requirement

The court explained that an LLC is considered a citizen of every state in which its members are citizens. A complaint relying on diversity jurisdiction must therefore identify the citizenship of the individuals who are members of an LLC, as well as the place of incorporation and principal place of business of corporate members. If an LLC is itself a member, the complaint must also identify the citizenship of that LLC’s members.

The complaint did not identify the members of either the plaintiff or defendant LLC. Instead, it relied on the companies’ business addresses and states of incorporation. The court stated that this did not properly establish diversity jurisdiction.

Order

The court ordered the plaintiff to amend its complaint on or before June 5, 2020, to allege the citizenship of each person or entity comprising both LLCs and the citizenship of all individual parties. The court did not dismiss the complaint in this order. It stated that, if the plaintiff could not truthfully allege complete diversity by that date, the complaint would be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice. Judge Jesse M. Furman issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.