Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled May 29, 2020

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Statewide Restoration of New York, Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:19-cv-11887
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentContract
In one sentence

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Statewide Restoration, Judge Engelmayer confirmed a $91,069.93 arbitration award and added interest, but awarded no case-related fees.

Who this affects

The petitioners—the identified funds, Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York, and New York City District Council of Carpenters—obtained a judgment against Statewide Restoration of New York, Inc. for $91,069.93 plus post-judgment interest. Statewide Restoration was not awarded relief, and the petitioners received no attorneys’ fees or costs for bringing the confirmation action.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Statewide Restoration, the petitioners sought to enforce an arbitration award against Statewide Restoration for unpaid contributions required by its labor agreements. The arbitrator found that Statewide Restoration owed the funds $91,069.93, and Statewide Restoration did not oppose the court case.

The court reviewed the award under the demanding standard used for summary judgment and arbitration confirmations. It found no genuine dispute about the amount owed and concluded that the arbitrator acted within his authority and had at least a reasonable basis for the decision. The court also determined that the petitioners had not shown bad faith supporting an award of fees for bringing the case, but that federal law required post-judgment interest.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer confirmed the arbitration award and entered judgment for $91,069.93, plus post-judgment interest under federal law. The court did not award attorneys’ fees or costs associated with the petition and requested that the clerk close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:19-cv-11887
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
May 29, 2020

Background

The petitioners were the trustees of several funds, the Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York, and the New York City District Council of Carpenters. Statewide Restoration was bound by a project labor agreement and a collective bargaining agreement with the Union. Those agreements required Statewide Restoration to make contributions to the funds, permit audits, and submit certain payment disputes to arbitration. They also provided for interest, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs in connection with unpaid contributions.

The petitioners audited Statewide Restoration’s books for August 17, 2017, through September 25, 2018, and determined that required contributions had not been fully paid. Arbitrator Roger E. Maher notified Statewide Restoration of the arbitration hearing, but Statewide Restoration did not appear. On July 30, 2019, Maher issued an award requiring Statewide Restoration to pay $91,069.93, consisting of delinquent contributions, interest, liquidated damages, late-payment interest, costs, and fees. After Statewide Restoration did not fully comply, the petitioners filed this action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act to confirm the award. Statewide Restoration did not formally oppose the petition or file documents in the case.

Confirmation of the Award

The court treated the unopposed request to confirm the award under the standards applicable to summary judgment. Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine dispute about a material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Even when a request is unopposed, the court must independently determine whether the supporting evidence meets that standard.

The court explained that review of an arbitration award is severely limited. A court generally must confirm an award unless it is vacated, modified, or corrected, and an award should be enforced if there is at least a barely reasonable justification for the result. Based on the award and the petitioners’ evidence, the court found no material factual dispute. It concluded that the arbitrator acted within the authority granted by the parties and relied on substantial and credible evidence that Statewide Restoration was required to make the payments and failed to do so. The court therefore confirmed the award in favor of the petitioners for $91,069.93.

Attorneys’ Fees and Post-Judgment Interest

The petitioners separately sought attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in bringing the confirmation action. The court held that Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act did not authorize that request. Although courts may award fees under their inherent equitable powers when an opposing party acts in bad faith, the petitioners had not provided evidence of bad faith. The court therefore did not award fees or costs associated with the petition.

The court awarded post-judgment interest beginning when judgment was entered and continuing until payment. It explained that federal law makes such interest mandatory on money judgments in civil cases and applies that rule to judgments confirming arbitration awards.

Disposition

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer confirmed the arbitration award and entered judgment for $91,069.93, plus post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). The court did not award attorneys’ fees or costs associated with bringing the petition and requested that the clerk close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.