Calcano v. Gamestop Corp.
- Andrew Carter
- 1:19-cv-09814
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Calcano v. Gamestop Corp., Judge Carter denied the parties’ joint request to stay the case and set deadlines for a motion to dismiss.
The plaintiffs and Gamestop Corp.; the case was required to proceed toward briefing on Gamestop’s motion to dismiss rather than being paused.
What happened
Marcos Calcano and other similarly situated plaintiffs sued Gamestop Corp. The parties jointly asked the court to pause the case while an appeal in Dominguez v. Banana Republic was resolved.
The court denied that request. It ordered the parties to proceed with briefing on Gamestop’s motion to dismiss, with deadlines of June 12, June 26, and July 3, 2020, for the moving brief, opposition, and reply.
Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. issued the order on June 1, 2020. The order addressed only the request to pause the case and the briefing schedule; it did not decide the motion to dismiss.
The detailed version
- Calcano v. Gamestop Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-09814
- Andrew Carter
- June 1, 2020
Background
Marcos Calcano brought this action on behalf of himself and other people described as similarly situated against Gamestop Corp. The parties jointly asked the court to stay, or pause, the action while an appeal in Dominguez v. Banana Republic, No. 19-CV-10171, was resolved.
Ruling
The court denied the parties’ joint request to stay the action. It ordered the parties to proceed with briefing on Gamestop’s motion to dismiss according to this schedule:
- Defendant’s moving brief: June 12, 2020 - Plaintiff’s opposition: June 26, 2020 - Defendant’s reply: July 3, 2020
The order set the schedule but did not decide Gamestop’s motion to dismiss. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. signed the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.