Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 5, 2020

Dawkins v. James Newman Law, PC

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-02671
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Judge McMahon dismissed Dawkins v. James Newman Law, PC without prejudice because Dawkins neither paid the filing fee nor submitted required forms.

Who this affects

The dismissal directly affected Plaintiff Jermaine Andre Dawkins and ended this complaint without prejudice; the opinion does not describe any ruling on the underlying claims against James Newman Law, PC.

What happened

In Dawkins v. James Newman Law, PC, the court gave Plaintiff Jermaine Andre Dawkins 30 days to pay the required $400 filing fee or submit a request to proceed without paying it. If he was a prisoner, he also had to submit a prisoner authorization.

The court had warned that failing to comply would lead to dismissal. Dawkins did not submit the required request and authorization or pay the filing fee.

Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The court also denied Dawkins permission to appeal without paying fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dawkins v. James Newman Law, PC · No. 1:20-cv-02671
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
June 5, 2020

Background

On March 31, 2020, the court ordered Plaintiff Jermaine Andre Dawkins to do one of two things within 30 days: pay the $400 fees required to file a civil action, or submit a completed application to proceed without paying those fees. The court also stated that, if Dawkins was a prisoner, he had to submit a prisoner authorization. The order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

What the Court Decided

The court found that Dawkins had not submitted the application to proceed without paying fees and prisoner authorization, and had not paid the filing fees. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling. The opinion does not address the underlying claims against James Newman Law, PC.

Appeal-Fee Ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Dawkins permission to appeal without paying the required fees. Judge Colleen McMahon also directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Dawkins and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.