GE Transportation Parts, LLC v. Central Railway Manufacturing, LLC
- James Oetken
- 1:19-cv-04826
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In GE Transportation Parts v. Central Railway Manufacturing, Judge Nathan ordered compliant joint redaction requests after finding the parties’ submission deficient.
GE Transportation Parts, LLC and Central Railway Manufacturing, LLC, whose joint redaction requests were ordered resubmitted.
What happened
GE Transportation Parts, LLC and Central Railway Manufacturing, LLC jointly submitted proposed redactions to the court’s June 1, 2020 Memorandum and Order.
The court found that the submission did not comply with its Individual Civil Rule 4 and did not explain how the proposed redactions fit the Second Circuit’s requirements.
Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered the parties to jointly resubmit compliant redaction requests within one week of the order.
The detailed version
- GE Transportation Parts, LLC v. Central Railway Manufacturing, LLC · No. 1:19-cv-04826
- James Oetken
- June 10, 2020
Background
The parties jointly submitted proposed redactions to the court’s June 1, 2020 Memorandum and Order. The opinion does not identify the specific information they sought to redact.
Court’s analysis
The court stated that the parties’ filing did not comply with the court’s Individual Civil Rule 4. It also did not explain how the proposed redactions would comply with the Second Circuit’s decision in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119–20 (2d Cir. 2006).
Disposition
The court ordered the parties to jointly resubmit compliant redaction requests within one week of the order’s date. The opinion does not state that the court granted or denied the proposed redactions themselves.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.