Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 10, 2020

Best v. The City of N.Y.

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:18-cv-05973
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Best v. The City of N.Y., Magistrate Judge Wang ordered Sean Best to file a second amended complaint by August 7, 2020 and set a telephone conference.

Who this affects

Sean Best and the ongoing litigation against The City of New York and the other named defendants.

What happened

In Best v. The City of N.Y., Sean Best, who was representing himself, asked the court for copies of filings, more time to respond and amend his complaint, and renewed consideration of his request for free legal counsel.

The court ordered that, if Best intended to continue the case, he had to file a second amended complaint by August 7, 2020. It also ordered that several filings and the order be mailed to the address then listed for him, and scheduled a telephone conference for July 21, 2020.

Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang cautioned Best that failing to update his address could lead to dismissal and said the request for free legal counsel would be addressed in a separate order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Best v. The City of N.Y. · No. 1:18-cv-05973
Judge
George Daniels
Date
June 10, 2020

Background

Sean Best, proceeding without a lawyer, sent the court a letter containing several requests. The court noted that Best had not complied with an earlier order directing him to update his address after the defendants represented that he had been released from custody. The court again cautioned that failing to promptly notify the court in writing of an address change could result in dismissal.

Best asked the court to mail him a copy of his first amended complaint and a copy of his opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss. He also requested a 60-day extension to respond to that motion and another 60 days from receiving the first amended complaint to file a second amended complaint. Finally, he asked that his request for free legal counsel be renewed.

Court’s Action

The court ordered that, if Best intended to continue litigating, he must file his second amended complaint by August 7, 2020. The court directed that copies of specified docket filings and the order be mailed to the current address listed on the docket because Best had not updated that address. The court stated that it would address his renewed request for free legal counsel in a separate order.

The court also scheduled a telephone status conference for July 21, 2020, at noon. Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.