Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 11, 2020

Gonzalez Nunez v. R. Gross Dairy Kosher Restaurant Inc.

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:18-cv-00861
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Gonzalez Nunez v. R. Gross Dairy Kosher Restaurant Inc., Judge Daniels canceled the pretrial conference and trial after learning the parties had settled.

Who this affects

The parties to the case: the plaintiff and the defendants. The scheduled pretrial conference and trial were canceled, and the plaintiff was required to seek court approval of the settlement by July 9, 2020.

What happened

In Gonzalez Nunez v. R. Gross Dairy Kosher Restaurant Inc., the court said the parties had settled the matter.

The court canceled the final pretrial conference scheduled for August 28, 2020, and the trial scheduled for September 14, 2020. It required the plaintiff to ask the court to approve the settlement by July 9, 2020.

Judge George B. Daniels issued the order on June 11, 2020. The opinion does not approve the settlement or decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gonzalez Nunez v. R. Gross Dairy Kosher Restaurant Inc. · No. 1:18-cv-00861
Judge
George Daniels
Date
June 11, 2020

Background

Nestor Gonzalez Nunez sued R. Gross Dairy Kosher Restaurant Inc. and other defendants, individually and on behalf of others described as similarly situated. The opinion states that the parties had settled the matter.

Court’s action

Because the parties reported a settlement, the court canceled the final pretrial conference set for August 28, 2020, and the trial set for September 14, 2020. The court directed the plaintiff to file a motion seeking approval of the settlement under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. no later than July 9, 2020.

Result

Judge George B. Daniels entered the order on June 11, 2020. The opinion does not state that the court approved the settlement, and it does not decide the merits of the claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.