Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 11, 2020

Joint Stock Company Channel One Russia Worldwide v. Infomir LLC

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:16-cv-01318
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Joint Stock Company Channel One Russia Worldwide v. Infomir LLC, Judge Moses stayed payment pending District Judge Daniels’s decision.

Who this affects

The plaintiff broadcasters and Infomir LLC, because the May 15 payment requirement was paused while the objections were pending.

What happened

In Joint Stock Company Channel One Russia Worldwide v. Infomir LLC, the plaintiff broadcasters asked the court to pause a May 15 order requiring payment of money. They asked for the pause while objections were being considered and before a final order was entered.

Infomir LLC did not agree to the request. The court granted the application and paused the payment requirement while the district judge considered the objections.

Judge Barbara Moses ordered that payment remain stayed until the district judge decides the matter or the court issues another order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Joint Stock Company Channel One Russia Worldwide v. Infomir LLC · No. 1:16-cv-01318
Judge
George Daniels
Date
June 11, 2020

Background

The plaintiff broadcasters asked the court to stay, or pause, a May 15, 2020 order requiring payment of money within 30 days. They requested the stay while objections filed with District Judge George B. Daniels were pending and until a final order was entered. The application stated that Infomir LLC had been informed of the request but did not consent.

Ruling

Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses granted the application. The order states: “Payment is stayed pending decision by the District Judge or further order of this Court.” The order did not decide the objections or resolve the underlying dispute.

Effect

The payment requirement was paused while the district judge considered the objections, unless the court issued a further order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.