Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 24, 2020

Todd v. Silverman

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:20-cv-03608
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Todd v. Silverman, Judge Roman ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve defendants in Keith Todd’s civil-rights lawsuit.

Who this affects

Keith Todd, the five named defendants, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service. The order arranged service of the lawsuit but did not resolve Todd’s underlying claim.

What happened

In Todd v. Silverman, Keith Todd, who is incarcerated, alleged under a federal civil-rights law that the defendants were holding him beyond the maximum expiration date of his sentence.

The court had allowed Todd to proceed without paying filing costs upfront. Because he could not serve the defendants before the court reviewed his complaint and issued summonses, the court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses were issued.

Judge Nelson S. Roman directed the Clerk of Court to prepare the required forms and summonses and provide them to the U.S. Marshals Service for service on the five defendants. The order did not decide the merits of Todd’s allegations.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Todd v. Silverman · No. 7:20-cv-03608
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
June 24, 2020

Background

Keith Todd, who was incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility, brought this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that Leroy Fields, Adam W. Silverman, Anne Marie McGrath, Tina Stanford, and Anthony J. Annucci were holding him in custody beyond the maximum expiration date of his sentence. The court had previously granted Todd permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of Process

Because Todd was proceeding without prepaying filing fees, he was entitled to rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court explained that Todd could not have served the defendants before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses to be issued. It therefore extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses were issued. The court stated that Todd should request an extension if service was not completed within that period.

Ruling

Judge Nelson S. Roman ordered the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summonses, and deliver the necessary paperwork and addresses to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Todd a copy of the order and an information package. Todd was required to notify the court in writing of any address change, and the court stated that the action could be dismissed if he failed to do so. The order addressed service of the lawsuit and did not decide whether Todd’s custody allegation was legally or factually correct.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.